![]() |
|||
LOVE IS A GREAT TALENT Shostakovich's Lady Macbeth has the talent of being able to love In his memoirs Dmitri Shostakovich wrote, "Lady Macbeth is a real
treasure for a composer". Taking Nikolai Leskov's story Lady Macbeth
of Mtsensk as his starting-point Shostakovich and the young dramaturge
Alexander Preiss from Leningrad wrote the libretto and planned Lady Macbeth
as a "tragic and satirical opera". Shostakovich dedicated the
work to his fiancée and future bride, therefore "it is obvious
that the opera will also be about love". A Slating Review in Pravda Dmitri Shostakovich described 28 January 1936 as perhaps the most memorable day in his life. He was on tour together with the cellist Viktor Kubatsky in Archangelsk and at the railway station there he bought the latest edition of Pravda. On page 3 he discovered a scathing article under the headline "Chaos instead of music" about his Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk - until then it had been performed in Leningrad and Moscow to great public acclaim and celebrated as the epitome of proletarian opera. Here was a devastating review that went even further and presented a fundamental reckoning with the "formalistic" direction and "leftist degeneration" in music. "The people expect beautiful songs and at the same time good instrumental works and operas", according to the article in Pravda. And what did Shostakovich impose on them? "Clattering, rattling and shrieking", "noise" and "neurotic music"; "if the composer occasionally finds himself going along the lines of a simple and understandable melody, he immediately - as if he were shocked about such a disaster - plunges into the labyrinth of musical chaos that in certain passages becomes cacophony." The ideals of socialist realism: "power of expression", "simplicity", and "good music's ability to stir the masses" were set against the deterrent example of Lady Macbeth. Shostakovich wrote in his memoirs - published by Solomon Volkov - "the article on page three of Pravda changed my whole way of life, once and for all. There was no signature at the bottom, in other words it was printed as an editorial. That means it pronounced the opinion of the party. In reality that of Stalin and that had significantly more weight." Undisguised threats "Chaos instead of music" was followed on 6 February 1936 by a second editorial in Pravda ("Distorted Ballet" was the headline of an article about Shostakovich's The Limpid Stream) and furthermore was the starting signal for an extensive press campaign. At a composers' congress held between 10 and 15 February 1936 other musicians as well as musicologists came into the firing line of the party.
The Fifth Symphony as a Creative Response In only three months, in the period from 18 April to 20 July 1937, Shostakovich
composed his Fifth Symphony, op. 47. The first performance of the work
took place on 21 November 1937 conducted by Yevgeni Mravinsky in Leningrad.
In an official statement Shostakovich wrote that the score was a "creative
response" to the criticism made against him. "If indeed I have
succeeded in putting everything into my music that I have thought and
felt after reading the critical articles in Pravda, I can be satisfied."
For a long time these words were taken at face value in East and West
- with satisfaction or with regret according to the location. For instance,
Shostakovich's colleague Dmitri Kabalevsky claimed that "After hearing
this work one can confidently assert that the composer, as a truly great
Soviet artist, has eradicated his earlier mistakes and taken a new direction."
Was and is this an accurate assessment? With his Fifth Symphony did Shostakovich
present a symphony in the sense of socialist realism - monumental, popular
and optimistic? This leaves us with the allegedly victorious and jubilant sounds of the finale which especially provoked the disapproval of western commentators. Did Shostakovich's Fifth Symphony, like Beethoven's or Tchaikovsky's follow a bold per aspera ad astra dramatic concept? When Solomon Volkov published the Memoirs, already quoted from, this speculation also lost all founding. Shostakovich writes, "What happens in the Fifth Symphony should, in my opinion, be clear to everyone. As in Boris Godunov the jubilation is forced and comes about by threats. It is as if they were beating us with a cudgel and at the same time demanding, "You must rejoice, you must rejoice". In 1938 Shostakovich wrote, "If indeed I have succeeded in putting everything into my music that I have thought and felt after reading the critical articles in Pravda, then I can be satisfied." Should we not take him by his word after all? Dmitri Schostakowitsch Original version from 1932, Conductor Valery Gergiev With Larissa Shevchenko, Vladimir Vaneev, Leonid Liubavin, Viktor
Lutsiuk, Gennady Bezzubenkov and Vienna Philharmonic Grosses Festspielhaus New production: 31 July 2001 |
|||